Much evil may be committed in the name of “justice” or “equality” or, ironically, “freedom.”
All of us believe in some version of those precepts. Thus, to oppose a strain of totalitarianism that gallops into town under a banner bearing the name of so noble an ideal would make one a monstrous bigot.
And, as we all know, being branded a bigot (or, worse, finding oneself on the dreaded “wrong side of history”) is a fate worse than death for any self-respecting progressive, much less for those weak-kneed souls who fear the wrath of social-media slacktivists.
Since “totalitarianism” is far too nonspecific to describe this precise phenomenon, let’s call it “totalitolerance.”
The news Monday that Missouri President Tim Wolfe had resigned, followed shortly by Chancellor R. Bowen Loftin’s own resignation, marked another curious case of campus “justice.”
Wolfe’s hand was forced by a growing backlash over several reported racial incidents, the most striking and recent of which was the smearing of human feces in the shape of a swastika in a bathroom at a residence hall, an event I’m grateful took place long after I had settled on a fantasy football team name for 2015.
To be clear, Wolfe’s “fireable offense” was the unforgivable infraction of insufficient sensitivity. A large number of students and many in the faculty felt that Wolfe had not been strong enough in his response to the racially-charged events of recent months, particularly in the context of the university’s history.
After all, as the Washington Post article on the racial tension at the school helpfully notes, Missouri “was a slave state.”
Although, to be fair, that probably wasn’t entirely Wolfe’s fault.
For his part, Loftin had condemned the racist acts. That didn’t spare him the same fate that befell Wolfe. He, too, was faced with the prospect of enormous pressure to leave his position. Like Wolfe, he capitulated.
Continue reading →
Untitled Online Dating Article
While I’m plenty boring, I lack the requisite narcissism to drone on about my uneventful life on a regular basis.
My one indulgence for 2016 is to discuss the observations I’ve amassed from over two years of immersing myself in the mildly distasteful world of online dating.
Lower your expectations. I don’t have any crazy stories. One, I’m a goody-goody (and boring—see above). Two, I’m very selective. Three, I’m actually pretty good on dates, especially first dates. I don’t get nervous, and I
don’t act weirdhide my weirdness well.All of that means that I’ve never had any dates that ended in acts of insanity or criminality by either party. They’ve almost all been C+/B- experiences. No complaints, but neither great enough nor bad enough to pass the tales down to future generations. I don’t have an unkind word to say about any of the women I’ve dated.
As such, my observations are general, not personal. I will say that a lot has changed in the last two-plus years. As a naive and (VERY) reluctant newcomer to the world of online dating, I had a lot to learn. Hell, back in 2013, I actually thought referencing an affinity for the Oxford comma in a profile summary was mildly clever. Then I saw 500 other people do it, and it became less so.
Here’s a rundown . . .
Continue reading →
Share this: