SitCombat: 4/4/13

SitCombatB2SitCombat’s days are numbered.

This week is the first of a two-part season finale for Archer.  Once Archer’s finished, that removes the competition for The Office.  No competition, no SitCombat.

I may still write a series finale piece on The Office, but that’s TBD.  For now, SitCombat has two more rounds until it goes to that great, big blog in the sky.

Ok, that makes no sense, but the point is that The Office has only two more chances at SitCombat redemption, something that has eluded it for several weeks now.

Here, then is the belated edition of the weekly clash, postponed by my 4,000+ words on a wrestling pay-per-view.  Yep.

This was SitCombat for April 4, 2013:

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary, Reviews, Television | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Twice in a Lifetime (Part Two)

DolphZigglerWHCWhen we left our heroes in Part One, Dolph Ziggler had overcome a loss earlier in the evening (as well as months of an inexplicably middling push) to capture, at long last, the World Heavyweight Championship against an Alberto Del Rio depleted by a post-match Patriot Act Lock, courtesy of one Jack Swagger.

Ziggler’s triumph (which, of course, may be a figment of my imagination) will set the stage for the most important moments of this year’s WrestleMania.  The six participants in the top three matches on the card include two men who wrestled last year in an “End(?) of an Era” match, and two other men who are wrestling each other a second time after last year’s “Once(?) in a Lifetime” match.  One of those three matches pits a man who gave a tearful, pseudo-retirement speech last year after losing to the very same opponent he now faces at WrestleMania in a, uh, retirement(?) match—an opponent who, after his victory, announced via Tout(?!?) that he was finished(?) with WWE and had “nothing left to prove.”

If there is one premise above all others upon which wrestling depends, it is the brevity of the collective attention span of its audience. Continue reading

Posted in Commentary, Sports, Television | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Twice in a Lifetime (Part One)

WM29One could make a fair argument that, in retrospect, the last two WrestleManias were merely prologue to this year’s event.

2011 saw The Rock “guest host” WrestleMania, eventually (and inevitably) involving himself in the main event match between The Miz and John Cena.  That led to WrestleMania 28, where The Rock and John Cena met in a non-title “(Not-so-)Once in a Lifetime” match, won by The Rock.  That, in turn, took us to this year, wherein The Rock and Cena defy all logic by going head-to-head again, this time with the newly-minted WWE Championship Ring on the line.

Will we get a classic, thoroughly memorable WrestleMania?  Or will this year’s Showcase of the Immortals in New York / New Jersey merely provide even more foreplay in the ramp-up to the thirtieth edition of the event twelve months from now?

Let’s find out.

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary, Sports, Television | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Imbeciles React to Justin Verlander’s Contract Extension

JustinVerlanderThe news last week that local athlete Justin Verlander had signed the most lucrative contract of any pitcher in the history of baseball met with praise and pride in the Central Virginia area.  The deal, valued at up to $202 million if he can spend $30 million in 30 days if an eighth year of the contract vests, prompted congratulations from most of the folks who weighed in online in response to the story.

Unfortunately, this being 2013, there was also a sizable contingent who had a very different take on the record-setting deal.  Here are some helpful examples in the form of comments posted on the local news stories related to the contract, along with my even-more-helpful responses:


Nobody is worth that much $, especially a ball player!! What about our servicemen, police, teachers???

They aren’t worth as much.  Justin Verlander has a unique skill set.  He does something very specific better than anyone in the world.  How many people on Earth can be MLB pitchers?  A few hundred.  And, of those, Verlander is the best, or at least one of the five best.  How many people in the world could potentially be teachers, soldiers, or police?  A few hundred million.  If not more.

Verlander is also a revenue-generator on a level that teachers, soldiers, or police, individually, never are.  On top of that, Verlander is paid by a private-sector organization, while soldiers, police, and non-private-school teachers (which is to say, most of them) are paid by the government using taxpayer funds. Continue reading

Posted in Commentary, Sports | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Understanding Scalia

ScaliaLibraryJustice Antonin Scalia authored a Supreme Court opinion published today that curtailed certain kinds of police searches using drug-sniffing dogs.  The holding in Florida v. Jardines was that such searches are unconstitutional and a violation of the rights secured by the Fourth Amendment.  Scalia notably lead a 5-4 majority that included “liberal” justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in opposition to the “conservative” minority that included Chief Justice Roberts and justices Samuel Alito and Anthony Kennedy (along with Stephen Breyer).

Don’t expect to hear all that much about this decision in the days to come.

No, the primary thrust of the Scalia-related coverage over the next week will be what an intolerant, ignorant monster he is.  He’ll be roundly criticized for his judicial philosophy by people who have never so much as read the entirety of the Constitution.  A few choice quotes will be bandied about by certain websites as grist for their ideological mill.

So, I write today to defend a man whose intellect I unashamedly admire—a man who really needs no defense in the first place.

Perhaps the most-talked-about exchange during today’s Supreme Court Prop 8 oral argument (and certainly the one of most interest to me personally) was this one, between Justice Scalia and Ted Olson.  It’s somewhat-lengthy, but worth the read.  I’ll comment at the end:


MR. OLSON: The California Supreme Court, like this Supreme Court, decides what the law is. The California Supreme Court decided that the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of that California Constitution did not permit excluding gays and lesbians from the right to get married-

JUSTICE SCALIA: You — you’ve led me right into a question I was going to ask. The California Supreme Court decides what the law is. That’s what we decide, right? We don’t prescribe law for the future. We–we decide what the law is. I’m curious, when -when did — when did it become unconstitutional to exclude homosexual couples from marriage? 1791? 1868, when the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted?  Sometimes — some time after Baker, where we said it didn’t even raise a substantial Federal question? When — when — when did the law become this?

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Let’s All Make Fun of Tom’s Brackets (2013 Edition)

Part of the aging process (I won’t go as far as to say “maturing”) for me has been letting some of my sports fandom fall by the wayside.  I’m down to about two sports now: MLB and the NFL.  However, there was a time when I was well-versed in the world of college basketball.  I could have named the starting lineups for most of the top ten teams, or at least the ones east of the Mississippi, and I certainly knew the head coaches of just about every school in the top 25.

ncaa-logoToday, my interest in college basketball pre-March is minimal at best.  I follow the University of Richmond, and I’m vaguely aware of how other state schools are doing.  VCU is essentially ubiquitous at this point, and knowledge of their performance will seep through whatever informational filters any Richmond resident has, even if one tries to avoid it.  Trust me.

To be fair, it was easier to keep track of college basketball when the best players often stayed for four seasons, and always stayed for at least three.  Likewise, a single conference conveniently included almost every D-I school in the state when I was 15.  That also helped.

Filling out a bracket and entering NCAA Tournament pools has become more “expensive chore” than “fun game” over the last decade.  Yet, despite my lack of knowledge and interest, I feel like my actual chances of winning haven’t decreased a bit.

Such is the absurdity magic of March Madness.

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary, Sports | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

SitCombat: 3/14/13

I could begin this week by explaining that SitCombat is tardy thanks to my working late, or my preparing tax documents, or my being a little under the weather.

True or not, though, nobody cares.

SitCombatB2This week marked the first new episode of The Office in a month. As such, the brutal comedy warfare known as “SitCombat” resumes.  Archer has been going strong during the interim.  It would be difficult for The Office to top Archer right now in any event, but making matters worse might be the fact that tonight’s episode is “The Farm.”

To get those who may not be aware up to speed, “The Farm” was supposed to be the (backdoor) pilot episode for the Dwight Schrute spin-off that would continue on after The Office ended this year.  As it turned out, execs didn’t like the pilot enough to give it a series order, so the episode was shuffled into the rotation as a regular season nine Office ep.  But the production number indicates that this “should” have been the fifth episode of this season.  Yet, it was postponed until now, after a month of re-runs.

Suffice it to say that that fact pattern doesn’t bode well.  As always, though, I’ll keep an open mind.

This was SitCombat for March 14, 2013 (If you can remember back that far):

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary, Reviews, Television | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Turf War

I don’t know who fired the first salvo in this unfortunate skirmish—does it matter?—but I wish that these two combatants that have meant so much to me over the years could recede to their natural borders and be content not to butt heads over some heretofore unexplored market share.


CerealWar


Hey, Quaker—be happy making Peanut Butter Crunch.

Hey, General Mills—be happy making Cinnamon Toast Crunch.

We’ve seen this before.  And we know this senseless conflict will only lead to tragedy.

I haven’t felt this way since . . . well, since this happened:



Table service?  Popcorn??  Dan Cortese?!?

Recipe for disaster, albeit disaster “your way.”

As always, the lesson is: stick to what you know.

Posted in General Culture and News, Pictures | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Lenses

Presented without comment (other than to say I’m mildly fascinated by it), here are the headlines and Gawker stories on the recent or semi-recent deaths of various famous people.  Click on the link to go to the original article, or on the picture for a full-sized view of the image:

Hugo Chavez


HugoChavezGawker


Continue reading

Posted in Pictures, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Child’s Constitution

With oral arguments taking place this week in the gay marriage cases currently before the Supreme Court, I thought it interesting that much of the coverage in the media over the last few days related to high-profile amicus briefs submitted on behalf of gay-marriage advocates.[1]

USFlagThe two briefs that garnered the most attention were the one filed by two NFL players, Brendon Ayanbadejo and the outspoken Chris Kluwe, and the other filed by a group of major American companies, including Facebook and Apple.

I find the nature of these briefs, and the media coverage of same, somewhat problematic.  The language used underscored the sad disconnect between the common understanding of constitutional law and the proper one.  And that disconnect is reinforced by a media that buys into the idea of a malleable Constitution shifting in tandem with elite opinion.

My problem with the briefs isn’t related to the fact that these parties advocate a position in favor of gay marriage.  No, the problem is the unmistakable point in each brief that blurs the line between constitutional, legal arguments and legislative, ideological arguments.

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments