I’m overdue for some housecleaning.
I originally began the Axis of Ego with the intention that I would be the primary contributor, but that others would generate content intermittently to supplement my work. The idea was for me to create the lion’s share of the writing, but also to bring other folks into the fold. Their purpose would be to provide voices different from my own while also usefully alleviating my personal workload during my busiest times of the year. This would ensure that there would always be at least two or three new items on the site each week.
March 7th, 2012 marked the one-year anniversary of the last time someone other than myself wrote something for this site.
In fact, the subject of that article was a series of gift suggestions for a then-unborn child whose first birthday is (obviously) approaching rapidly.
I think my principle reason for trying to create a website that had multiple authors was my belief that such a site has more inherent credibility. A sole author’s work is merely a blog, of which there are literally hundreds of millions across the internet.
Of course, this is just a blog, after all. I realized fairly early on that I would have to distinguish it from those millions of others with worthwhile content rather than with an attempt to dress up my blog as something resembling a poor broke man’s Huffington Post or Gawker (minus some of the snark or the lefty leanings).
I’ve realized over the course of the fourteen months of this site’s existence that it also functions as an online portfolio of my writing work. Or, if you prefer, an endless audition directed at no one in particular. There’s no reason not to take ownership of that.
The upshot of all this is that there will be a few cosmetic changes made to the Axis of Ego. Those of you who merely frequent the front page and read the newest pieces probably won’t detect any difference whatsoever.
There still may be guest articles from time to time, but I have no plans to seek those out or ask for help. I have more than enough good ideas (or at least “ideas”) to formulate content on a regular basis without any outside input, just as I’ve done for over a year now.
Thank you for your continued readership. Feel free to follow me on Twitter.
Carry on.
The Need to be Needed
Bill Maher made a compelling case for a National Day of No Outrage on last week’s Real Time. After glancing at ESPN.com over the weekend and realizing that three of the front page headlines were about apologies for various types of behavior, I thought it might be a good idea to present the video of Maher’s comments:
I agree generally with everything Maher says here, and my only quibble would be that I would prefer we exist in a permanent state of “no outrage.” There’s one point in particular that’s worth repeating: The idea that what fuels much of this outrage is a need for us to feel important by stopping “the bad people.”
This is an idea that I discussed last week when I said that “[b]eing able to dismiss your opposite number as inferior or trivial quite obviously enhances one’s own feelings of superiority or importance, as does attaching inflated significance to the success or failure of your political agenda.”
This is a commonplace “tell” for ideologues of all stripes. It’s necessary for many people to feel as though what they do (or believe) is not only personally fulfilling, but absolutely pivotal to our society. Put another way, they can’t accept the fact that something might only be subjectively important. They need it to be important to the world at large in order to enhance their own sense of self-worth. There’s a narrow-mindedness attached to this, to be sure, but there’s an element of narcissism or insecurity as well.
But also consider again why this is done. Take any of the above topics. Or, take, for example, recent postulations over the sad case of Trayvon Martin that assert that racism is as prevalent and significant as ever in the United States. Much of the causation for that mentality is the same one that Maher and I highlighted.
Continue reading →
Share this: