When wrestling fans scour the television landscape in anticipation of pivotal moments in WWE history, the Tables, Ladders, and Chairs pay-per-view isn’t the top candidate to produce such moments.
That’s an understatement. TLC is a “gimmick” pay-per-view, built around a particular, extreme match type. That gimmick serves as a substitute for critical storyline events and feud-ending matches that headline shows like Wrestlemania or Summerslam.
Yet, more and more in recent years, WWE seems willing to use the “in-between” PPVs for important plot elements that fundamentally affect the product for months or years to come. A case-in-point would be not only the creation of a PPV around the Money in the Bank match, but, specifically, the 2011 event, which set into motion major shifts for the company that remain relevant over two years later.
All of which brings me to this Sunday.
We’re being led to believe that this “filler” show will, in fact, alter the very structure of the company. Unifying the two world titles will change everything from the way Raw and Smackdown are organized to how Money in the Bank and Royal Rumble work. It will also reduce any confusion about who the standard-bearer is for the company at a given moment in time.
But what’s actually going to happen on Sunday? Let’s look at it:

As something of an 80s music aficionado (for better and for worse), I have probably heard Chicago’s “If She Would Have Been Faithful” at least 100 times in my life. I’m not bragging about that. Just stating it as a fact. Yet, it was only recently, after not hearing the song for some time, that I detected a rather . . . unique lyrical style.
But Blockbuster was the most successful national company by far, thanks to a business model that included tailoring a store’s selection to fit local demographics, as well as a breakthrough in the form of video game rentals, something that became possible (and lucrative) after Blockbuster won a
I’ve talked before about how I enjoy writing for a bunch of different outlets, because doing so allows me to write about such varying topics. One of the things that burned me out on being full-time at VirginiaPreps was writing the same four articles every week for over a decade. I liked it, but, eventually, it got to be too repetitive to do full-time.
Breaking Bad is finished, and what an ending it was. The short version is that I thought it was excellent, and totally appropriate for that show. To be fair, I should note that I absolutely adored the same Lost finale that a good chunk of Lost fans hated, so I have no way to gauge what the reaction will be to the Breaking Bad ending.
The saga of teacher-turned-kingpin Walter White comes to a conclusion this Sunday night.
If you excised the flashback scene, I have to wonder whether a newbie watching the pilot and “Ozymandias” back-to-back would even realize it was the same series.


Best of 2013
So, there’s my lame excuse.
Still, of those five dozen or so items, there are several I like quite a bit (or at least find amusing). Here’s a look back at the stuff I liked best in 2013. As always, I’ll go in chronological order:
About Last Night (1/11): I started the year off on a high note, taking a trip to New York City after being secretly tipped off by old friend (and talented performer) Joey Bland that none other than Sir Patrick Stewart would be a surprise player in their Improvised Shakespeare Company show one random Thursday night. This is my account of that incredible evening.
Will High School Sports Exist in 2043? (1/31): As our society (or at least taste-makers) are increasingly less-inclined to value the “risk” portion of the “risk/reward” proposition, I question whether youth sports will continue to have the level of importance they do today a generation from now. More to the point, I wonder if youth sports will become increasingly specialized, and an activity that schools consider to be too much of a liability, no matter how much benefit or pride they bring to a community.
What Media Bias Looks Like (2/11): The accusation of “salting” the news to favor a particular side isn’t one born in 2013. However, when the media got its hands on polling data related to trust in various news outlets, the presentation of that data offered a fairly sharp example of what media bias looks like (and what it does not look like). Continue reading →
Share this: