With the latter of the conventions coming to a close tonight, and, more importantly, me not wanting to stay up late to crank out another dog-related post, I thought it might be useful to dust off this gem from about six months ago. It’s worth a read as we ramp up for the hellish days of the last two months of a presidential election cycle.
I hate to interrupt a string of lighthearted cultural observations, sports references, and stories about awkward moments in the annals of entertainment history with something more serious—but here goes.
A fascinating journal article came to my attention a couple of weeks ago. The piece was remarkable in its content and unintentionally provided me with a helpful (if unnecessary) reminder about the current state of political discourse in the United States.
The paper, “After-birth Abortion: Why Should the Baby Live?” appeared in the Journal of Medical Ethics on February 23rd. The title is appropriately suggestive of the subject matter. The crux of the argument advanced by authors Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva is that, since abortion is accepted (or at least legal) in many circumstances wholly unconnected to the health of the baby or the mother, and since a newborn baby has not yet achieved true “personhood,” it therefore…
View original post 3,382 more words




This will serve both as a launching point for a feud, as well as a nice callback. Of course, the preferable outcome might be Kane not interrupting (or interrupting to say “best wishes” and give them a bread-maker), and then Bryan cruelly dumping AJ at the altar as payback for the mindgames of the last couple of months. Good lord, it’s weird that I actually devote brainpower to this stuff.



This is Not Lunch
I understand that commenting on the eating habits of Americans is well-traveled territory. And I’m certainly not within hailing distance of proper eating habits. However, there are still certain lines I won’t cross—lines that separate man from insatiable animals unable to distinguish between piles of barely-edible refuse in a dumpster and actual sustenance.
Hardee’s (or, for those of you in the unsettled territories, “Carl’s, Jr.”) has a promotion called the “$5 Big Bag Lunch.” I will now deconstruct this abomination.
Continue reading →
Share this: